Tuesday, December 07, 2004

What is Radio Selling?

I’ve been thinking about music and radio a lot lately, especially given all buzz recently on Satellite radio. (Recall we visited this topic over the summer).

Here’s a simple question that many people get wrong: What does (terrestrial) radio sell?


Think about it for a moment before answering.

If you are like most media consumers, your answer will be “advertising.” Since Radio is media, and most media rely on advertising, it’s a reasonable conclusion.

That answer, however, is wrong.


You are the product. What Radio sells is you. At least, you, as a member of a larger aggregated audience. Sure, it’s packaged, demographically dissected, cross marketed and sold -- but its still what Radio sells. You may think of yourself as a consumer when you listen to radio, trading your time in exchange for music, news, weather, talk, etc. But that’s a false if common misunderstanding. Radio costs you nothing (except time). Advertisers are the actually consumers.


If you understand that simple perspective shift, than the decline of entities like Clearchannel Radio (previously discussed) becomes apparent and inevitable. The stock is off some 33% since April of this year – while the S&P500 is appreciably higher.


After the 1996 telecommunications reform act, which gave the green light to Clearchannel’s massive acquisition spree, the industry started shifting dramatically. That the largest player in radio failed to understand this simple concept is rather telling. The consildation led to a slow decrease in listenership of their music audience, just as the internet was gaining penetration.


I suspect that decline will be irreversible.

The Hamburger Helper Effect
Consider the modus operandi of all
consolidators: Purchase assets, eliminate redundant administrative functions, achieve economies of scale. Clearchannel did this – and more -- by firing local program managers, DJs, eliminating formats, and tightening playlists – all of which ultimately reduced the amount of varied music on the radio.

In effect, they lowered the overall quality and breadth of what they were playing. Equate this to a hamburger chain introducing meat extender. It will certainly lower costs, and increase profits – but only short term. Over time, the patrons of the restaurant simply will stop coming. Revenue slides, repeat customers go away, so the business tanks.

That’s FM radio today.


What’s so fascinating has been how quickly the audience’s “Screw you guys, I’m going home” attitude has manifested itself. As noted above, what radio sells to advertisers is their audience. That audience, tired of Hamburger Helper, has shifted away, easily finding the all beef burger: iPods, internet streaming, P2P, and satellite radio.

2 Comments:

At 2:26 PM, KirbyMeister said...

Yup.

And the massive amount of indie bands making their music availible on the internet.

 
At 12:27 PM, Scott said...

Very good points. You should also mention Podcasting. http://ipodder.org
Essentially podcasting is subscription based radio delivered in digital audio. NewsWeek called it Tivo for your iPod. As far as I know all the podcasts out there 1000+ are free.

CNN has covered it at http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/12/08/podcasting/
The Independent at http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=590702
Time at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101041213-880259,00.html
NewsWeek at http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6640519/site/newsweek/

Adam Curry of MTV fame and fortune has a daily podcast with ~50,000 subscribers. http://live.curry.com/

In fact, Matt's post on 12/8 referes to a site, IT Conversations, that is offering all of its audio content via podcasts.

There is even an ASCAP licensed Podcast- Coverville http://coverville.com.
Coverville might make for an interesting discussion. It has a $250/yr license to play music as downloads instead of an internet radio streaming license. This is significant because licensing music to stream is very, very expensive.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home