Shuffling Technology for Creativity?
Jerry Del Colliano has an interesting column on the Shuffle feature of MP3 players. (We've previously discussed this in "iPod shuffle = new radio ?").
Is it a case of technology triumphing over creativity? With the effects of radio consolidation run rampant, frustrated listeners have turned to alternatives like the Shuffle, as well as internet radio.
Colliano wonders whether this is a good thing. Features such as Shuffle plays back only songs we know and like -- but avoids finding the new, the unknown, the challenging:
"But when we look at the music industry as a whole, is Shuffle a copout? Shuffle allows us to pick songs we know and love and make them sound new again. This is in direct opposition to the idea and passion of finding new music to fall in love with instead of sticking with the familiar classics. The download model, which drives the Shuffle concept, has given a vibrant new life to the once-mighty single market."I find that the success of shuffle is not so much the result of a technological triumph -- rather, it marks one business failing (terrestrial radio) being replaced with another business success (iTunes, iPod, Sat radio, Net Streaming). Radio consolidation marked the death knell of local, innovative, intelligent music programming over the free airwaves. And the Technology Industry has stepped in to fill the void.
What does this mean for the music industry going forward -- or in fact, going backwards. The album model is being subverted once again for a singles model:
"For decades in the classic rock period, you were compelled to buy an entire album, not just a single. Can you imagine just buying “Comfortably Numb” from Pink Floyd’s The Wall when you didn’t own the entire album? Today, the iPod generation does just that. Does the newly-found ability to buy download singles and the major labels’ willingness to sell music in this model help to create great new records? Ask yourself this question: how many truly great (I mean a 10 out of 10) albums have you bought in the last 15 years? How many of those records were released in the last few years? When you do spring for an album, how often do find that there are only one or two good tracks on it? How often do you wish you hadn’t bought that album you thought you would like for $15 when you could have bought a DVD movie for $24 that you are almost guaranteed to like?"The one thing I have to take issue with Colliano on is the "10 CDs."
As we noted at the end of 2004, there are plenty of terrific CDs.
You just don't hear them on the radio . . .
>
Sources:
The Shuffle Phenomenon – A Technological Fix For a Creative Problem?
Jerry Del Colliano
The Audio Revolution, March 10, 2005
http://www.avrev.com/news/0305/10.shuffle.html
And Now For Some *Real* Radio
Mark Morford
SFGate.com - Wednesday, March 9, 2005
http://sfgate.com/cgi bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2005/03/09/notes030905.DTL&nl=fixMark

1 Comments:
I disagree that shuffle mode only plays back what we like, not finding anything new.
How many people like me own 500 CDs and have actually listened to them all? Now that many of them are on my iPod, Shuffle actually does introduce me to new music that I already own. It's been an eye-opening experience, and very enjoyable. Then by rating them I grow my playlist of favorites everyday.
The industry is probably bummed that we can get more value from that which we already own, but that's the brilliance of these players.
Post a Comment
<< Home